Organise and lead:
Michael R. King, assistant professor of finance and Bank of Montreal faculty fellow, Ivey Business School, Western University, advocates putting together a team consisting of a senior manager and frontline staff, and meeting with other like-minded organisations, with the goal of getting in front of regulators. “You then have to provide input during different phases,” he said. “You have to have a senior person who is responsible for managing regulation, who is able to follow the agenda, and manage the team across organisations.”
Right now, it’s primarily been the banks that have been doing this, but King sees an opportunity for treasurers to do the same. “Treasurers are perhaps the most influential bodies in terms of what central banks are worried about. Treasurers make decisions on investment, jobs and ultimately economic growth,” he said. “But they don’t necessarily have a voice in these discussions. It tends to be directly between the regulators and the regulated, which are the banks. So corporate treasurers have to work together to communicate their point of view and identify issues that make their business more difficult and more expensive.”
Educate the regulator
There are inevitably points in the rule-making process where regulations are proposed; seize this comment period as a time to educate regulators. “There will be proposals that come out that are open for consultation, and at that point, they’ll want to speak to industry experts like yourself,” King said. “As you see in the case of the liquidity coverage ratio, the rules actually did not get implemented until 2013. And in response to input from the industry, they were revised.”
Make your thoughts public:
Andrei Kirilenko, professor of the practice of finance, MIT Sloan School of Management, cautioned against holding private meetings. “Regulators have to react to information that is on the public record,” he said. “It gets on the public record in a very precise way. Your private meeting with the chairman of a regulatory agency is not on public record; it’s just a private meeting. It has to be done in a context of roundtables, conferences—something that gets it in the public record. Once it’s in the public record, the regulator will consider it.”
Don’t just write a letter
Letters are an easy way to voice your concerns, but they’re also easy to dismiss and forget. “Letters are a useful starting point; they put it on the record,” King said. “But the better answer is forming forums between corporate treasurers and some regulatory agencies—having workshops with the rule makers to explain what is going on and educate them in the same way that other parties are doing.”
The UK’s Prompt Payment Code will have a significant impact on the relationship between large businesses and their suppliers. What does the Code mean for your business? And how can you navigate this change effectively?
When it comes to the relationship between Europe and Britain – uniformity isn’t a word that currently springs to mind. And that’s not just a reference to Brexit. Whilst the Europe and Britain do find themselves in the midst of a political break-up – their monetary policies are also showing signs of divergence.
Europe’s introduction of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) next May will have implications for businesses around the world and US corporates should start getting ready if they haven’t already done so.
As anticipated, US organisations exited prime money market funds en masse following last year’s SEC reforms. AFP’s latest Liquidity Survey indicates what it will take to encourage them back.