A netting centre incorporated across your organisation can
allow for the best method of creating a single cash flow, to or from each
participant, which increases intercompany efficiencies. There are four types of
netting processes analysed in this article: bi-lateral netting; multi-lateral
netting; re-invoicing; and netting in conjunction with an in-house bank (IHB).
Figure 1: Before
Most organisations will begin by settling their
obligations with each entity through multiple cash flow transfers. Not only is
this workflow inefficient and costly, the company loses visibility on currency
shortfalls, which leads to increased FX trades. By introducing a netting system,
currency exposures are adequately monitored and consolidated. This allows for
internal borrowing to be the first method of settlement (economically cheaper
than external borrowing).
Figure 2: After
Using a netting
system, each participant pays or receives a single currency balance to or from
the netting centre. This centralises the control and monitoring of all cash
flows, which is essential to the treasury department.
Depending on the complexity of your organisation, one of four
netting methods may be deployed (bi-lateral netting; multi-lateral netting;
re-invoicing; and netting with an IHB).
- Bi-lateral netting is the
settlement of cash flows domiciled in the same currency. For example, entity A
bills $20 to entity B, and entity B bills entity A $15. Since both participants
operate in the same currency, the settlement will be exchanged in US dollars
(USD). The netting centre will aggregate this information and distribute $5 to
entity B in a single transaction. This saves the organisation from fees
associated with additional transfers that would be required if netting was not
- Multi-lateral netting is the technique used to manage
intercompany transactions, usually involving multiple counterparties resulting
in a single receipt or payment. For example, entity A receives invoices from
both entities B and C. Instead of having entity A engaging in the settlement
between each counterparty, they will in the end pay a summed amount to the
netting centre. Then the netting centre will accumulate all payable settlements
across the company and streamline the distribution to each receivable entity in
their appropriate country (as outlined above in Figure 2). This leads to
substantial savings related to the condensed volume of transfers and the
reduction in cross-border charges.
- Re-invoice netting is an
arrangement where all intercompany transactions, billed in multiple currencies,
are centralised. Foreign currency payables and receivables are netted with a
single settlement to the re-invoicing centre, essentially moving the invoice
exposure to a single collection point (netting centre). For example, entity A’s
functional currency is in USD but is billed by other entities in euros (EUR),
sterling (GBP), and yen (JPY). Instead of having entity A engaged in FX trades
to settle with each entity in their appropriate functional currency, entity A
pays the equivalent amount of their local currency (USD) to the netting centre.
This will eliminate their FX exposure to only one currency, their functional
currency. Then, the netting centre will gather all currencies across the company
and make a single decision on what currencies they are long or short. Once an FX
trade decision is executed, the distribution of cash flows is issued to the cash
positive entities. This leads to substantial savings related to the condensed
volume of transfers, the reduction in FX trades executed, and FX risk associated
with the netting centre, and is not a liability of the individual entities.
- Netting with an IHB is a process that includes similarities
of bi-lateral and multi-lateral netting, but instead of tangibly settling with
each entity in the appropriate currency, the amount is rolled into the IHB where
they may receive or pay interest on their funds. It is essential to note that
the netting centre and IHB work cohesively together, but are still determined as
separate tasks in relationship to each other. The netting centre needs to
aggregate all transactions first and then decide what method of settlement will
take place; creation of an intercompany loan, cash, etc. There are many inherent
benefits that go along with this method. It allows for the functional currency
to stay in the appropriate country, bypassing any fees or legal requirements
associated with moving funds out of that region. This will also decrease the
fees associated with the transfer of funds to each entity. Essentially a virtual
payment is created, increasing or decreasing the in-house balance where interest
is calculated based on their credit risk (also dependent on defined cycle,
monthly, quarterly, etc.).
operations are in dire need of a netting system to manage the input of
intercompany transactions, interim netting rates, trades, and trade rates. The
benefits that are delivered to a corporation with a netting solution are:
- A central repository of intercompany transactions.
systematic/settlement risk exposure.
- Less currency accounts required.
- Ensures security of the company’s cross-border payments by controlling the
distribution on behalf of the subsidiaries.
- Enables headquarters to
efficiently manage currency exposures and netting cycles.
fundamentally a very simple process once the required structure and protocols
When looking for a sophisticated solution, make
sure robust reporting is available. Also ensure your company can establish
different payment methods – such as single euro payments area (SEPA), Federal
Reserve Wire Network (Fedwire) and automated clearing house (ACH) – that
security persists throughout the application with sophisticated controls around
what entities versus the clearing house can see, and intercompany activity can
be imported manually or through file upload.
Regardless if your
objective is to forecast hedged cash flows in conjunction with intercompany
invoices, create a lending programme, or simply use the solution as a third
party disbursement structure, a netting centre has numerous intrinsic advantages
that will substantially increase your company’s profitability while centralising
A decline in the return on capital employed of globally listed companies over the last decade has been noted in recent EY and PWC reports. This is despite businesses taking an increased focus on balance sheets since the financial crisis in 2008.
Global trends, technology and the role of the treasurer in 2025 were hotly debated by treasurers at this year’s Treasury Leaders Summit in London. A focus on technology and automation was universal, others argued over the impact of macroeconomic and global trends on treasury.
The benefits of an in-house bank are increasingly evident, but some treasury departments still hesitate to take the plunge. This article offers a step-by-step guide.
As the squeeze on banks intensifies, virtual accounts are a win-win by offering efficiencies and meeting the needs of their corporate clients.