The UK’s regulatory model must adapt to provide a smarter, more fit for purpose regulatory infrastructure to ensure the future competitiveness of the UK’s financial services industry, according to the Confederation of British Industry (CBI).
In a newly-published report entitled Smarter Regulation, the UK’s largest business group recommends changes for regulators to “provide certainty and stability in a post-Brexit landscape”.
The report asserts that new forms of regulatory dialogue are paramount to safeguarding competition, ensuring small and medium-sized firms (SMEs) in the sector can compete with larger traditional players. The CBI’s recommendations include:
- A sector-wide call for evidence on the cumulative impact of regulation.
- More formalised collaboration between UK watchdogs the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA).
- Regulators should create new sector engagement initiatives – such as firm open days and sector secondments – to give greater opportunities for them to engage with firms.
- A thorough re-assessment of the FCA’s criteria to determine fixed and flexible portfolio classification.
- Flexible portfolio firms should have new and regular opportunities to engage directly with the FCA and to offer feedback.
“A strong financial services sector is the lifeblood of the wider economy, enabling the growth and security that business and society rely on,” said Simon Moore, CBI financial services director.
“Through the revenue and growth opportunities it generates, the sector helps to secure the vital public services we use day in, day out, and acts as a magnet for investment into the UK that helps to underpin our local communities.
“But in order for the sector to support business and to benefit everyone effectively, regulation must be fit for purpose. A cultural change is needed to ensure a more practical approach to regulatory shift, through collaboration and engagement, creating a level playing field between smaller firms – who are disproportionately hit by the regulatory burden – and larger companies competing in the sector.
“Smarter regulation – not less regulation – will provide certainty to financial services firms, allowing them to adapt in a shifting political and economic climate as well as anchoring our competitiveness as a global financial centre.”
Companies have only a limited time to complete their preparations before the UK departs the EU, warns Marsh executive Mark Weil.
The bank and the International Financial Corporation are continuing the eight years old trade finance partnership with a further investment.
Although the EU’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) is now better understood by asset management firms, too many grey areas still surround the regulation, claims Linedata.
European insurers are likely to use it increasingly in response to the capital adequacy requirements of the directive, reports Fitch Ratings.