Europe’s upcoming stress test results, conducted by the European Banking Authority (EBA) look set to emphasise differences in bank asset quality between Spain and Ireland, where the state has been able to intervene, and Italy, which is still trying to solve an enormous nonperforming loan (NPL) problem, says Standard & Poor’s (S&P).
In its assessment of their respective banking sectors, the credit ratings agency (CRA) notes that there are big differences in asset quality in these three countries.
In both Spain and Ireland, the government, under European Union (EU) supervision, intervened to help the struggling financial sector, creating so-called ‘bad banks’ to manage NPLs and taking measures to recapitalise and restructure lenders.
The result is that the ratio of NPLs to tangible common equity and reserves – often known as the Texas ratio – is significantly lower, and coverage ratios significantly higher, in these countries than it is in Italy. There, the state is struggling to clean up bank balance sheets amid fears that private investors in subordinated debt could be bailed in under the new European Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).
The five Italian banks being stress tested – UniCredit; Intesa Sanpaolo; Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena; Banco Popolare Societa Cooperativà; and Unione di Banche Italiana – have, in aggregate, tens of billions more in NPLs than the six Spanish companies – Banco Santander; Banco Blibao Vizcaya Argentaria; CaixaBank; Banco de Sabadell; Bankia; and Banco Popular Español – a total of more than €220bn. The Italian lenders would need €68.88bn in additional capital to reach a coverage ratio of 80%, compared to €39.64bn for the Spanish banks and €21.85bn for the two Irish banks.
Italy is now striving to address its systemic weakness without breaching the EU moratorium on state aid. There is a distinct danger that private investors could face losses under European bail-in rules, threatening the government of prime minister Matteo Renzi.
Ireland’s banks are noticeably benefiting from a recovery, reports S&P. Allied Irish Banks (AIB) achieved provision writebacks in 2015, boosting profits. Bank of Ireland (BoI) booked low credit costs, equivalent to just a fifth of operating profits. Both banks achieved double-digit returns; none of the 11 Spanish and Italian banks in the stress test sample managed this.
Banks in Spain and Italy, apart from Valencia-based Bankia, were impeded by significantly higher credit costs in 2015, typically paying out more than half of their pre-impairment operating profits to cover loan losses. Returns were not impressive either in Spain or Italy, but were generally higher for the Spanish banks – a trend that continued into the first quarter of 2016.
Spanish banks’ figures are somewhat flattered by the exclusion of foreclosed and restructured loans and other noncore assets from the strict NPL ratio.
In terms of the Texas ratio, Italian banks are significantly worse off than their Spanish or Irish peers, with Unione di Banche Italiane, Banco Popolare Società Cooperativa and Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena all registering higher NPLs than tangible common equity and reserves at the end of 2015. This is also true of Banco Popular Español which has since launched a rights issue and announced a plan to aggressively reduce its nonperforming assets during the next three years.
Given that the impending EBA stress test underlined the need for Popular to act, these three Italian banks look exposed and might be required to raise capital, concludes S&P.
Forecasts for 2016-2020 place Africa as the second fastest growing region in the world (at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.3%), just below Emerging Asia.
Sentiment in the financial services sector deteriorated in the three months to September, as firms digested the challenges of lower interest rates and the uncertainty caused by the vote to leave the European Union (EU), according to the latest CBI/PwC Financial Services Survey.
However, a London summit on the industry’s introduction of the technology cautions that testing and acceptance are still at an early stage and firms should proceed with caution.
The proposals of both US presidential candidates could shake up operating conditions in several sectors, reports the credit ratings agency.