Investec’s investment strategy head assesses impact of Brexit

Sterling faces further pressure if British voters support the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union (EU) in the forthcoming referendum on June 23, says John Wyn-Evans, head of investment strategy at Investec Wealth & Investment.

Wyn-Evans believes that many UK industry sectors, particularly banking, would suffer from a ‘Brexit’. However, in an assessment of the likely implications for investors, he forecasts that smaller sub-sectors such as travel and leisure would benefit.

His assessment focuses on the following areas:

Implications for investors:

What impact could ‘Brexit’ have on assets and on currencies and how should portfolios be positioned?

A Capital Economics study of various surveys into the effects of Brexit on the UK economy showed that, over an unspecified forecast horizon, there was a gap of 22% of gross domestic product (GDP) between the most extreme views.

The resulting uncertainty – and the difficulty even for professional investors in making sense of such information – suggests that market participants will demand a higher risk premium until the outcome becomes clearer, leading to underperformance of UK assets relative to overseas assets in the immediate short term.

Additionally, a vote to leave will involve new trade agreements – not only with the EU, but also with other trading partners – and could take years to complete. Other separatist movements, for example, in Scotland and Catalonia, might have the potential to create further disruption.

Impact on sterling:

A vote to leave the EU is assessed as very negative for sterling because of its potential to impact the economy and international trade. It is also distinctly possible that UK-based investors will look to hedge their risks by taking money out of the country, adding to the pressure.

Several high-profile investment banks have suggested that the pound could lose between 10 and 15% of its value in the event of Brexit based on experience during the 2008 financial crisis; a risk seen as too high a risk to ignore.

However, a full-blown crisis is unlikely; the fiscal position is improving and the country is solvent. There is also a self-correcting mechanism built into a falling pound in that the trade balance will improve and income from overseas assets will also be boosted in sterling terms. On balance, though, the pound “will continue to trade weaker.”

Impact on bonds:

Looking at other asset classes the main positive factor impacting the performance of UK government bonds is that, whatever the result, it will still be the same government in charge, meaning a perceived safe hand on the tiller and a commitment to balancing the budget.

The outlook for interest rates and inflation will have the most profound effect on gilts. The UK is a very open economy and prone to bouts of inflation, especially in response to a weak pound. Yields could rise in the face of higher inflation, exposing investors to capital losses with limited income to make up that loss.

On the other hand, if the economy was undermined the Bank of England (BoE) might be forced to stay its hand on raising interest rates to boost growth. Given that deflation is currently perceived in economic circles to be the greater existential threat, it is possible that rates would remain relatively low with the yield curve steepening.

Sovereign bonds constitute a key “insurance” element of portfolios and will continue to protect from unexpected negative developments, as they have done in early 2016. Any uncertainty about the economy may only serve to widen credit spreads in the sterling investment grade bond sector, potentially opening up better buying opportunities.

Impact on equities:

Wyn-Evans notes that large UK companies have recently been battered by influences well beyond British shores. Resource companies have been affected by collapsing commodity prices and exporters to emerging markets by the slowdown in China, for example. The fortunes of such large companies will not be materially affected by domestic events. Indeed, a weaker pound would bolster profits by making our exports more attractive and by flattering the translation of earnings booked overseas.

Dividends declared in dollars would enhance yields to sterling investors. With some three quarters of FTSE 100 revenues and earnings derived overseas, large cap equities provide a natural hedge against domestic uncertainty especially the defensive healthcare and tobacco sectors and also media.

Impact on banking sector:

More domestically exposed sectors and smaller companies will remain under greater pressure as concerns rise about weak demand, higher input costs as a result of the lower pound, and a wage-driven margin squeeze if access to cheaper labour from Europe is cut off.

The biggest potential loser is the banking sector, which is under pressure from several angles. A major concern is the threat of loss of access to European markets, something which is currently permitted via passporting rights. It is probable that banks would have to apply for new licences to operate on the Continent, which would reduce the attraction for international banks to base their European operations in London. HSBC, for example, has said it might relocate 1,000 staff. Any reduction in banking activity would have severe knock-on effects for London’s economy and real estate market.

Impact on travel and leisure companies:

Certain smaller sub-sectors could benefit from Brexit. Travel and leisure companies with greater exposure to the UK would see more in-bound tourism with overseas travellers attracted by a cheaper pound. UK holidaymakers would also be more inclined to stay at home.

Testing companies could prosper if the UK abandons the current EU accreditation system and reintroduces a separate British standard.


Investec’s stance is to continue to focus on high quality investments in a sensibly diversified portfolio with some tilts to reflect stocks or sectors where it sees asymmetric risks, and the inclusion of overseas assets to hedge currency risk. “It is probable that more opportunities will arise as the campaign unfolds and nerves start to fray,” Wyn-Evans concludes.


Related reading