In a recent report by treasury solution provider Kyriba, called “SaaS vs. ASP: Beware of the Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing”, it is explored how ASP systems are less accessible than SaaS solutions and as a result, implementation of cloud technology has expanded exponentially.
Kyriba also explain the difference between ASP (Application Service Providers) and SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) for the benefit of those who do not have an awareness of these terms. Alongside this, the study reports how many ASP systems disguise themselves as cloud technology, which is why it is important for corporations to understand the difference.
“There are many wolves masquerading as sheep (i.e. ASP providers claiming they are SaaS) in the treasury software industry, and the software industry at large, so it is important to help you find the wolf in sheep’s clothing,” the report says.
Although ASPs are available on the Internet, they are installed systems hosted by a vendor or third party and are occasionally referred to as Hybrid or Private Cloud solutions by software providers. However, when SaaS or the Public Cloud was released, it was cheaper and systems were optimised further with better performance, better security and better service levels.
Kyriba emphasise that ASP needs to be installed in order to be used and manual daily configuration by employees is compulsory for operation, whereas SaaS systems utilise automatic updating software.
Data security is important for all vendors and Kyriba addresses the advantage of SaaS solutions being cheaper to implement as network security, encryption, access rights are invested in skilfully and can be spread across all clients in different countries.
The study also comments on the importance of Recovery Time Objective (RTO), which is how much time it will take to return to operating fully after a disruption and Recovery Point Objective (RPO), which is how much data you can lose while systems are down. These two concepts are important particularly when discussing service levels as software and data full redundancy and connectivity are minimum requirements for a treasury department.
The ASP providers, or as Kyriba describe them, wolves in sheep’s clothing, attempt to disillusion customers into thinking that they offer similar services as SaaS providers, according to this report. In this report, Kyriba are trying to encourage readers to talk to treasury technology experts and have an awareness of the differences. “By doing your research, which may include engaging experts in treasury technology, you can validate the distinctions and what those differences mean for you. Put yourself in the position to take full, not partial, advantage of the Internet,” the study says.
Small businesses may make the world go round, but struggles with book balancing and accounts can be distracting and end up throttling ... read more
The Swiss reinsurer highlights 21 emerging risks that its industry and society in general should keep on its radar.
For organisations looking at purchasing new risk solutions in order to address increasing pressures in this area, the bobsguide Risk Management Systems Guide features a comprehensive matrix allowing buyers to compare and contrast the different functionalities of solutions in the market today.
Treasury Innovation Forum (TIF), a GTNews event, is designed to provide treasury and finance professionals with industry analysis, peer-to-peer-discussion and access to the latest industry research. Taking place on the 29th June at DoubleTree Hilton, Victoria, London, this one-day event promises to provide insight to helps treasury professionals stay one step ahead.