The past five years has seen the balance of power between bank and client shift back towards the client in Asia, according to East & Partners Asia (E&P Asia).
“Five years ago, at a time when very few corporates were thinking of changing bank, the overwhelming reason for those which did change was improved debt offerings,” comments E&P Asia, in its just-released
‘Asian Institutional Transactional Banking Markets (ATB) Report’
“Churn intentions are on the rise and the main reason for changing bank is the need for added value in the relationship.”
The report’s findings draw from interviews with chief financial officers (CFOs) and corporate treasurers of the region’s 1000 largest companies by revenue, across 10 markets excluding Japan.
In November 2009, when only 6.1% of the top 1000 said that a change in primary transaction banker was either “definite” or “highly probable”, 87.5% nominated improved debt offerings and securities as the single largest factor which would influence them to change.
This was far ahead of the second-ranked factor, a lack of added value in the banking relationship, which was cited by only 48.2%. Third was service levels and performance, nominated by 46.4% (the results sum exceed 100% due to multiple responses).
However, by November 2014 the banking landscape had shifted significantly. In this research round, with 24.2% of respondents indicating a change of bank was either “definite” or “highly probable,” the two largest factors influencing a change – both equally cited by 75.8% of the top 1000 – were the lack of added value in the relationship and value for money.
Improved debt offerings, which dominated in 2009, were cited by 70.9%. Value for money, by way of contrast, was a factor for only 35.2% in 2009, so the number seeing this as a factor for churn has more than double in five years.
“Credit conditions are much easier than they were in 2009, bank margins are thinner, and competition for business from new players is intensifying,” said
, chief executive (CEO) of E&P Asia.
“It’s clear that customers are in a much more powerful position than they were, and that is reflected in their much higher expectations across service factors. Back in 2009, we were coming out of the global financial crisis and corporates were sticking with their banks, and were much more reliant on them for credit.”
The US money market fund reforms came into effect in 2016 and are already dramatically shaping US fund industry with investors flooding out of prime funds and into government securities. While the reforms are similar, they are not the same. GTNews interviews Yeng Bulter, global head of the cash business at State Street Global Advisors on the differences.
There are various ways for financial institutions to benefit from advanced technologies and business models provided by FinTech's. Whether a business' approach is radical or incremental, data management can help a company to increase their return on investment, argues André Casterman, INTIX.
Due to the low interest rate environment and Basel III regulation many corporate treasurers, who may have in the past been very reliant on the banking sector to provide them with cash management solutions, have been forced to explore alternative options as banks have been refusing short dated cash deposits.
Apps are a critical part of treasury's shift into mobile banking as 67% of treasury and corporate finance professionals said mobile banking services are of particular interest to them in a recent survey.