India’s union budget for fiscal 2016, which was released on February 28 by Indian finance minister Arun Jaitley, is generally positive for the country’s corporate and infrastructure sectors, but the implications for its banks are more mixed, says Moody’s Investors Service.
“Measures designed to reduce and rationalise taxes, boost economic growth and increase the ease of doing business will support the credit profiles of Indian non-financial corporates, but a reduction in the fuel subsidy allocation is credit negative for upstream oil and gas companies,” said Vikas Halan, a Moody’s vice president and senior credit officer (VP/SCO).
Halan’s comments were made ahead of the release of a Moody’s commentary on the fiscal 2016 budget, entitles
‘India Budget: Credit Neutral for Sovereign, Positive for Corporates and Infrastructure, and a Mixed Bag for Banks’
“By comparison, public sector banks can expect limited near-term relief, with the government allocating a significantly lower amount of capital than in recent years, while proposals to set up a bank board bureau and adopt a new bankruptcy law have the potential to improve governance over time, if implemented effectively,” says Srikanth Vadlamani, also a VP and SCO at Moody’s.
For non-financial corporates generally, Moody’s notes that the budget proposes to reduce the corporate tax rate to 25% from 30% over the next four years, and also seeks to rationalise the tax structure, in part, by increasing the excise duty rate and introducing a unified goods and services tax from April 2016.
On the other hand, a proposed increase in the service tax – the indirect tax paid on the value of services consumed – is credit negative as it will raise the cost of production for Indian corporates.
Another credit negative factor, and specifically for upstream oil and gas companies, is the decision to lower the fuel subsidy allocation for fiscal 2016 as it indicates that the subsidy burden of these corporates will remain high in fiscal 2015 and that they will have to bear any shortfall in the subsidy amount in fiscal 2016.
For the infrastructure sector – including power, highways and railways – recommendations in the budget would both raise public sector investment and encourage private sector investment.
“A significant increase in planned public sector capital expenditure, coupled with measures to increase investment and financing in the private sector, will be credit positive for infrastructure companies,” said Abhishek Tyagi, a Moody’s VP and senior analyst.
The budget also proposes setting up a National Investment and Infrastructure Fund (NIIF), which would raise debt and invest in infrastructure finance projects, helping enhance – along with other measures – the ability of infrastructure firms to access funding.
As indicated, Moody’s believes that the budget’s implications for India’s banks are mixed, noting for example that their capital allocation for fiscal 2016 is lower than fiscal 2015.
However, the government proposes to improve governance and set up an autonomous bank board bureau, which would help public sector banks in areas such as management quality and strategy.
The proposed introduction of a new bankruptcy law would also be credit positive, says Moody’s. The current weak bankruptcy framework has been a major impediment for banks in enforcing credit rights. However, few details on the new law are currently available.
Direct carrier billing is currently a competitive payments industry in Europe, but will it flourish under PSD2? EE and Microsoft think so.
This year’s EuroFinance conference in Barcelona is billed to be bigger than ever so we have picked out 10 of the best sessions taking place next week.
After winning the German presidency for her fourth term, Angela Merkel must weld a coalition government or have a minority rule with the most far-right politicians seen in 50 decades.
Leaked documents from the UK Home Office proposing that low-skilled EU migrants would be restricted in the UK’s post-Brexit immigration scheme may be more likely to increase automation and off-shoring of labour, rather than increase British wages, industry experts have warned.