Making European Union (EU) banking regulation fully compliant with Basel standards will be tough, but important for enhancing consistency and comparability, and restoring investors’ confidence in risk-weighted assets (RWA), Fitch Ratings says.
According to the credit ratings agency (CRA), this is because addressing all the major non-compliance issues raised by the Basel Committee’s ongoing regulatory consistency assessment programme (RCAP) on 5 December would require changes to the EU’s capital requirements regulation (CRR).
The Basel Committee has focused since 2012 on reducing excessive variability in banks’ RWA calculations and enhancing disclosure. The consistency of risk weights is critical for calibrating and analysing bank capital globally, as the RWA, alongside leverage, form the foundation for capital requirements, and also forthcoming total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) requirements for global systemically important banks, which are proposed at 16%-20% of RWA and 6% of leverage assets.
Fitch notes that European bank capitalisation has strengthened notably since the financial crisis, including ahead of the 2014 European Central Bank (ECB) comprehensive assessment, despite the Basel Committee’s “materially non-compliant” grading for the EU. However, there is more to do to ensure banks’ reported RWAs are consistent and credible.
The RCAP highlights the complexities in comparing bank capital across borders. Differences in accounting rules and market practices also add to challenges for global comparability. An EU move to improve Basel compliance would aid comparability and analysis of bank capital, and reduce investor scepticism.
Other jurisdictions have less work to do, says Fitch. The US assessment, released on the same day, found that implementation of the securitisation framework did not meet Basel standards, although the US was “largely compliant”. Previously, Brazil, China, Singapore, Switzerland, Australia and Canada were graded overall “compliant”, but most jurisdictions will have some less material elements of non-compliance.
The European Commission (EC) highlighted the political nature of the EU legislative process for implementing Basel standards and concerns about economic growth in a press release responding to the RCAP. The Commission also says that the EU’s divergences from Basel are partly influenced by its highly ambitious approach of applying a single rule book to all its 8,000 banks, even though the global standards agreed in Basel are designed to apply only to large, internationally active banks.
The most interesting outcomes of PSD2 will be derived from companies combining open banking with data from other areas like social media or government, argued Miles Cheetham, Open Banking Ltd.
In today’s digitally connected world, infinite quantities of data are produced by consumers daily at a mind-boggling pace and volume. With under three months left to prepare, here are four areas for businesses to consider, to make sure they are ready for GDPR implementation.
The architecture of financial markets has changed and we will soon see the end of the last eight years of prosperity, said Stefan Bielmeier, chief economist and head of research at DZ Bank.
The US money market fund reforms came into effect in 2016 and are already dramatically shaping US fund industry with investors flooding out of prime funds and into government securities. While the reforms are similar, they are not the same. GTNews interviews Yeng Bulter, global head of the cash business at State Street Global Advisors on the differences.