It will be critical for China to more efficiently allocate capital and resources if it is to achieve sustainable economic growth in the next few years, a report from Moody’s Investors Service suggests.
“In this context, capital market development will play an important role in allocating resources within the real economy and supporting economic re-balancing,” said Jenny Shi, Moody’s country manager for China. “Here, the ultimate purpose of economic re-balancing is to ensure sustained economic growth.”
Shi was speaking on the release of a special comment titled
‘Development and Reform of China’s Capital Market to Support Sustainable Economic Growth’
and which was the basis of a speech she delivered on 8 November at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting in Beijing.
Shi identified four key areas necessary for the development of China’s capital market: securitisation; reform in local government debt; the internationalisation of the renminbi (RMB) market; and the formation of global connections.
“China’s securitisation market, which is still at a developmental stage, is playing a key role in deepening the country’s credit market, but the diversity of the investor base needs to broaden to truly shift risks away from the domestic banks,” said Shi.
Moody’s noted that at a time of tighter bank lending in China, securitisation is providing an alternative funding source for larger corporates as well as small and medium enterprises (SMEs). It is also helping banks revitalise their own balance sheets.
In addition, securitisation acts as an important funding source for lenders of consumer loans, who will, as a consequence, lend more money to consumers. Securitisation thereby assists in China’s push to make domestic consumption a bigger driver of economic growth.
With reform of local government debt, the new guidelines announced by China’s State Council in October, together with earlier reform measures, will enhance the creditworthiness of Chinese regional and local governments (RLGs) as they will further pave the way for these entities to borrow in their own names rather than through intermediaries.
Moreover, despite uncertainty over the timeframe for full implementation, the guidelines are another milestone in the development of a Chinese local government bond market and in China’s broader policy goal of economic re-balancing.
So far for 2014, the internationalisation of the RMB bond market has progressed significantly and new issuance continues to grow despite the softening in the RMB. For January-September 2014, total dim sum bond issuance – which is offshore RMB denominated – totalled RMB451bn.
Such a high level of issuance is a strong indicator of the offshore RMB market’s successful transition from pure currency play into an international fixed-income asset class.
Finally, global connections are important, and opening up China’s capital markets to foreign investors will directly increase the capital pool available to the efforts on economic re-balancing.
China’s steps towards financial liberalization, such as the Renminbi Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor program (RQFII), are providing new opportunities for foreign investors and intermediaries.
The US money market fund reforms came into effect in 2016 and are already dramatically shaping US fund industry with investors flooding out of prime funds and into government securities. While the reforms are similar, they are not the same. GTNews interviews Yeng Bulter, global head of the cash business at State Street Global Advisors on the differences.
The top five sectors Asian fintech investors are interested in are data analytics, blockchain, lending, payments and regtech, according to Gary Hwa, EY regional managing partner.
On the third day of the Singapore Fintech Festival conference, there was a focus on specific applications of fintech innovation. One was trade finance, which is clearly is ripe for a revolution.
Kicking off day two of the Singapore Fintech Festival, Deloitte Chairman David Cruikshank said that fintech is significant for three reasons. First, customer expectations of services are higher than ever. Second, barriers to entry are lower than before. And finally, financial institutions (FIs) face a threat of what a competitor might do.