Apac Firms Alerted to Europe’s Shortened Settlement Cycle

More than half of Asia Pacific’s firm are unprepared for a shorter settlement cycle in Europe, which will change from trade date plus three days (‘T+3’) to trade date plus two days (‘T+2) in October, a survey suggests

Published by Celent and commissioned by Omgeo, the post-trade efficiency specialist, the study found that 58% of Apac firms were not ready for the change. Of the firms surveyed, approximately one in six firms has not started to implement necessary process and technology changes to operate in a T+2 environment.

The study also revealed, just weeks before the 6 October implementation date in Europe, that 19% of firms are not aware of the impending move to T+2. The issue of preparedness is significant with 56% of firms citing penalties for non-compliance as a major risk, while 38% of firms are concerned about failed trades and increased operational costs, according to the study.

“In Asia-Pacific, a shorter European settlement cycle will be particularly challenging due to operational complexities associated with time zone differences,” said Matthew Chan, head of Asia strategy at Omgeo.

“For firms with significant European trading activity, automating processes is critical to meeting the T+2 deadline. It is also important that firms match trades on local T+1, as the current T+3 buffer for managing mismatched trades will cease to exist within the new compressed cycle.”

Shortening the settlement cycle in Europe is partly driven by the upcoming implementation of the Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR) – in development since 2012 and adopted by the European Council in June 2014 – and Target2Securities, the new European settlement engine.

The CSDR applies to market participants located outside Europe, which means that securities trades executed on European venues by firms in Asia-Pacific will be required to adhere to the T+2 settlement cycle. Time zone differences with Europe effectively mean Asia-Pacific will be on a tighter post-trade schedule than locations in Europe.

Other key findings of the report include:

• Seventy-three per cent of firms plan to change their processes to meet the T+2 requirements for Europe, while 64% indicate they will need to upgrade their post-trade technology.

• Fifty-six per cent of firms cited penalties for non-compliance as a key risk with 38% also concerned about increased operational cost.

• Sixty-seven per cent of firms highlight investment managers as the least prepared segment for the move to T+2.


Related reading