Greater collaboration between financial institutions’ (FIs) risk and prudential regulation areas is essential to reduce risk and optimise performance while meeting regulatory requirements, according to Wolters Kluwer Financial Services.
Selwyn Blair-Ford, the firm’s head of global regulatory policy, told delegates at the ‘RiskMinds Risk & Regulation Forum’ held in Barcelona, Spain of the growing collaboration and dependency between the two functions. Blair-Ford outlined four key steps to achieving equilibrium between risk and regulation:
- Have a single reconciled source of information: A standardised approach to data management across functions can create faster and better quality data, which can be reused for multiple purposes, helping to address regulatory requirements and yielding significant benefits at the operational level.
- Use a common internally understood language: Along with a standardised data set, setting common vocabularies across different business operations can enable organisations to break down silos created by multiple geographies, functionalities and asset classes.
- Verify that each function recognises the same risk events and issues: Where this does not occur, firms should understand and agree on why this cannot be accomplished.
- Present information to key decision makers in a controlled and concise manner: Granular, reliable and accurate risk information must be reported internally in an organised and controlled manner, in the form most easily understood by those decision makers.
“Regulators now require more detailed qualitative information and expect to see evidence of effective risk management processes,” said Blair-Ford. “This requires firms to be able to express their risk appetite, demonstrate that the board is responsible for setting it and that the firm is being managed appropriately within those risk parameters.
“As there are now many prudential regulatory calculations that require risk expertise from the departments of finance, treasury, risk, credit and operational risk, it is becoming increasingly essential that risk and compliance work hand in hand to effectively manage the organisation’s risk, report on it quickly and in detail to senior management and regulators, while optimising business performance.”
Blair-Ford added that regulation standards such as Basel III and Dodd-Frank Act require financial institutions to perform multiple risk calculations and modelling techniques such as value at risk (VaR), expected shortfall, loss given default, exposure at default and collateral valuation adjustment (CVA), in order to accurately report on the business’ capital, liquidity, counterparty, credit and market risk to regulatory bodies.
Risk expertise is also required to meet stress testing and reverse stress testing requirements outlined by regulators.
Sentiment in the financial services sector deteriorated in the three months to September, as firms digested the challenges of lower interest rates and the uncertainty caused by the vote to leave the European Union (EU), according to the latest CBI/PwC Financial Services Survey.
However, a London summit on the industry’s introduction of the technology cautions that testing and acceptance are still at an early stage and firms should proceed with caution.
The proposals of both US presidential candidates could shake up operating conditions in several sectors, reports the credit ratings agency.
The Danish shipping and oil conglomerate confirmed that it will separate its businesses into stand-alone transport and energy divisions.