Delegates attending the Sibos 2014 conference in Boston at the end of this month organised by Swift will be interested in whether the issue of economic sanctions against Russia has elbowed its way onto the agenda.
The financial messaging services provider has responded angrily to a recent European Parliament (EP) resolution calling on the European Union (EU) to expel Russia from the Swift network. The proposed legislation will now be submitted to the European Commission (EC), where it will need the collaboration of individual states acting in unison if it is to take effect.
The statement issued by Swift in response read: “Under fundamental principles of European law, enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the singling out of Swift in this manner interferes disproportionately with Swift’s fundamental right to conduct business and its right to property. It also constitutes discriminatory and unequal treatment.
“Explicitly mentioning Swift in a European Parliament resolution of this kind on such an international sensitive matter also creates immense damage to our company’s reputation. Our mission remains to be a global and neutral service provider to the financial industry. The provision of financial messaging services to Russian entities is not affected by the current measures in force.”
The EP’s resolution has echoes of a similar request by the European Council (EC) to Swift in 2012, when the EC ordered the network to cut off funding to Iran as part of a campaign to stall the country’s nuclear energy programme. Although Swift’s stance is to be politically neutral, it complied with the EC’s wishes.
However, at least one prominent figure in Russian’s banking system has indicated that he believes the EP is bluffing. Speaking at this year’s international investment forum, held in the Russian city of Sochi, Andrei Kostin, chief executive officer (CEO) of VTB Group, Russia’s second largest bank, said on September 19: “I think this is not going to happen. I would have called it an act of direct aggression against Russia’s financial system with all subsequent consequences. This is a very tough measure.”
Swift’s alarm has no doubt been heightened by reports that Russian authorities are in discussions with China on establishing an alternative interbank transaction system. Russia has been publicly announcing its intention to reduce the financial market’s dependence on SWIFT since the US began stepping up economic sanctions against Russia. As a result, both Visa and MasterCard denied services to some Russian banks owned by blacklisted individuals.
The most interesting outcomes of PSD2 will be derived from companies combining open banking with data from other areas like social media or government, argued Miles Cheetham, Open Banking Ltd.
In today’s digitally connected world, infinite quantities of data are produced by consumers daily at a mind-boggling pace and volume. With under three months left to prepare, here are four areas for businesses to consider, to make sure they are ready for GDPR implementation.
The US money market fund reforms came into effect in 2016 and are already dramatically shaping US fund industry with investors flooding out of prime funds and into government securities. While the reforms are similar, they are not the same. GTNews interviews Yeng Bulter, global head of the cash business at State Street Global Advisors on the differences.
As the May 25 deadline for Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) inches closer, many treasurers are being lumped with the task of ensuring their wider company is compliant.