Medtronic, the US-based medical product manufacturer, is paying US$42.9bn for a rival in Ireland and plans to reincorporate in the country.
The deal makes Minneapolis-based Medtronic the latest – and so far the biggest – US company to try to change its tax domicile through a so-called inversion. Such deals are attractive to American companies seeking a lower corporate tax rate.
However, the company stressed that the purpose behind the purchase for Ireland’s Covidian was also to access billions in cash trapped overseas.
“The combined company should generate significant free cash flow, which can be deployed with much greater flexibility,” Medtronic’s chief executive (CEO), Omar Ishrak, said in a conference call with analysts.
Medtronic stressed that it intends to use its strengthened balance sheet to invest US$10bn in the US over the next 10 years, in an effort both to appease critics of inversions, and to emphasise the importance of the US for the medical device industry.
“The only reason they’re doing the inversion is to free up the cash overseas,” Bill George, Medtronic’s former CEO, said in an interview. “That money today can’t be put to good use right now.”
Nonetheless, by shifting its business headquarters in Ireland Medtronic will avoid paying US taxes when it wants to move money between its overseas and US subsidiaries. The debate over ‘repatriation’ of overseas profits to the US has been ongoing for three years, with business leaders, lobbying for a tax holiday.
Although Ireland’s corporate tax rate of 12.5% compared with a rate of 35% paid by many US corporations, the rate paid by Medtronic in 2013 was only 18.3% according to RBC Capital Markets.
GTNews asks Pugsley about what advice she would give to treasurers dealing with mergers and acquisitions, what the key challenges for her year ahead will be and how she is selecting a treasury management system (TMS).
The US money market fund reforms came into effect in 2016 and are already dramatically shaping US fund industry with investors flooding out of prime funds and into government securities. While the reforms are similar, they are not the same. GTNews interviews Yeng Bulter, global head of the cash business at State Street Global Advisors on the differences.
Tim de Knegt, strategic finance and treasury manager for the Port of Rotterdam, discusses how he is using blockchain, the challenges he will face in his role of treasury over the next 12 months and the advice he would give to someone starting out their career in treasury.
Due to the low interest rate environment and Basel III regulation many corporate treasurers, who may have in the past been very reliant on the banking sector to provide them with cash management solutions, have been forced to explore alternative options as banks have been refusing short dated cash deposits.