The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) indicated Tuesday that it is considering regulating Bitcoin. Separately, New York’s financial services regulator also took steps toward state regulation of virtual currencies.
Mark Wetjen, acting chairman of the CFTC, said that his agency is “looking into” regulating virtual currencies. “It’s been initiated, there’s been an internal discussion at the staff level,” he said.
Federal regulators had generally taken a “wait-and-see” approach to Bitcoin, as indicated in a series of hearings on the subject late last year. However, a string of recent incidents—including the collapse of Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox after more than a half a billion dollars in the cryptocurrency was stolen—has prompted regulators to consider taking action.
Though US Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen recently said that the Fed has no jurisdiction to regulate Bitcoin, the CFTC might be a different story. Wetjen said the regulator has broad authority to counter manipulation of commodity markets and is looking into whether Bitcoin falls under those rules, Reuters reported. “I think people (in the agency) believe there’s a pretty good argument that it would fit that definition,” Wetjen said.
Wetjen added that there is a separate question of “whether or not there is some derivative contract based on, or denominated in, a virtual currency and whether that’s listed on an exchange. There’s some looking into that question too.”
New York regulators meanwhile continue to be a bit more aggressive overall. Benjamin Lawsky, superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) has issued a public order that his department is considering formal proposals and applications for virtual currency exchanges operating in New York.
Firms can submit formal proposals and applications immediately. This application process would be a precursor to regulations the NYDFS plans to propose by the second quarter 2014.
“The recent problems at Mt. Gox and other firms further demonstrate the urgent need for stronger oversight of virtual currency exchanges, including robust standards for consumer protection, cybersecurity and anti-money laundering compliance,” Lawsky said in his statement.
Lawsky held virtual currency hearings in January, in which he advocated for “Bitlicenses” for virtual currency firms.
Lawsky added that virtual currencies are unlikely to disappear and will continue to exist in one form or another. “As such, turning a blind eye and failing to put in place guardrails for virtual currency firms while consumers use that product is simply not a tenable strategy for regulators,” he said. “Our overarching goal is to balance creating appropriate regulatory protections without stifling beneficial innovation in the development of new payments platforms.”
Weeding Out the Bad Seeds
With all of the bad press Bitcoin has gotten so far in 2014, it is no surprise that the US and Japan are considering regulating it and China has virtually “banned” it, noted Gilles Ubaghs, senior analyst, financial services technology for research firm Ovum. “It would on the surface look like a lot of the magic dust behind Bitcoin is quickly evaporating,” he said.
But while recent developments like the Mt. Gox collapse do not bode well for Bitcoin, it is important to remember Bitcoin itself is not the problem, Ubagh emphasised. “It’s the emerging institutions around bitcoin which have proven problematic,” he said. “Storing Bitcoin and trusting Bitcoin exchanges are, I think, more the greater concern for the market at this point. Confidence in some of the institutions around Bitcoin will have wobbled, but not in the actual currency itself.”
What has suffered is the very rapidly development of legitimate Bitcoin businesses and the many exchanges out there that are trying to “tame” Bitcoin and make it easier to use, Udagh said. “Regulatory approval of bitcoin is still very nascent with divergent views and policies on it, and I think it will take a long time for any sort of coherence to emerge,” he said. “It’s unclear still what the US might do, but with markets like Singapore seeming fairly relaxed about it, we could easily end up in environment of largely ‘offshore’ Bitcoin exchanges.”
Furthermore, the non-centralised nature of Bitcoin creates more problems for regulators. “While you can regulate the exchanges of bitcoin, you can’t really regulate the currency itself, only the points where it interacts with the real economy,” Ubagh said. “That’s a major pinch point, but dedicated users will always be able to find a way around that, likely without much hassle.”
Given time, Ubagh sees more reputable Bitcoin sites and services with better infrastructure and security emerging. “A lot of the initial players in Bitcoin have developed from some slightly weird places—Mt. Gox started as a Magic the Gathering card game exchange,” he said. “I think it will take awhile to shake out the tree as it were, so I wouldn’t be surprised if there was more scandal and intrigue in the Bitcoin market in the coming months.”
Cash-flow based metrics now feature prominently alongside traditional revenue measures of business performance in the key figures or financial summary pages of any public company.
GTNews asks Pugsley about what advice she would give to treasurers dealing with mergers and acquisitions, what the key challenges for her year ahead will be and how she is selecting a treasury management system (TMS).
The US money market fund reforms came into effect in 2016 and are already dramatically shaping US fund industry with investors flooding out of prime funds and into government securities. While the reforms are similar, they are not the same. GTNews interviews Yeng Bulter, global head of the cash business at State Street Global Advisors on the differences.
Tim de Knegt, strategic finance and treasury manager for the Port of Rotterdam, discusses how he is using blockchain, the challenges he will face in his role of treasury over the next 12 months and the advice he would give to someone starting out their career in treasury.