Europe’s financial institutions (FIs) lack trust and understanding in the valuation of intellectual property (IP), with potentially serious implications for the ability of businesses of all sizes to access funding and to innovate suggests a report.
Entitled ‘Intellectual Property Valuation’, the report summarises the conclusions and recommendations of a European Commission (EC) appointed panel of European IP valuation experts.
The authors state that IP and IP rights (IPRs) play an increasingly important role in corporate strategy. However, a lack of understanding of the value of IP still remains a major obstacle to their emergence as a tradable asset class.
This lack of trust in the accuracy of valuation of an organisation’s IP has a wide-ranging effect on all types of business activities, from not being able to use IP as collateral for loans, to inconsistent valuation of IP on the balance sheet of an organisation and in specific scenarios such as asset valuation in mergers and acquisitions (M&As) or insolvency.
The authors agree that bottlenecks related to the valuation of IP and IPRs are a barrier for engaging in IP transactions, but also suggest that the lack of commonly-accepted valuation methods per se is not the main barrier.
The increasing importance of IP in today’s economy highlights major hurdles for accounting and reporting as it is generally not well represented in companies’ financial reports. The report recommends improvements in IP valuation and reporting so that FIs can start to accept IP as collateral for loans. Among the other recommendations are the following:
- Establishing a European facility to underwrite the risk to lenders for IP asset based lending.
- Enhancing the credibility of IP valuations by improved valuation information especially by collecting information and data on actual IP transactions in a form suitable for use to support IP asset-based lending decisions.
- Increasing confidence in the quality of valuations.
- Investigating requirements and mechanisms for intangible asset reporting in annual accounts.
In addition to greater clarity on IP value and securing funding against IP assets, the authors call for reporting practices that allow such asset value to be transparently recorded. In addition, the ability to defend valuable assets and to claim damages also requires damage valuation to be transparent within the courts.
The full report can be accessed here.
In today’s digitally connected world, infinite quantities of data are produced by consumers daily at a mind-boggling pace and volume. With under three months left to prepare, here are four areas for businesses to consider, to make sure they are ready for GDPR implementation.
Cash-flow based metrics now feature prominently alongside traditional revenue measures of business performance in the key figures or financial summary pages of any public company.
GTNews asks Pugsley about what advice she would give to treasurers dealing with mergers and acquisitions, what the key challenges for her year ahead will be and how she is selecting a treasury management system (TMS).
The US money market fund reforms came into effect in 2016 and are already dramatically shaping US fund industry with investors flooding out of prime funds and into government securities. While the reforms are similar, they are not the same. GTNews interviews Yeng Bulter, global head of the cash business at State Street Global Advisors on the differences.