Recent developments highlight China’s efforts at reforming and regulating – but not rolling back – the growth of shadow banking, a report by Fitch Ratings suggests.
The credit ratings agency (CRA) notes that the process is still evolving, and it feels that risks may continue to reside away from the spotlight of the regulators. As a result, structural pressures within the banking sector are likely to persist, exposing short-term rates to volatility but keeping them above historical averages.
The onset of these reforms is particularly salient, as China’s credit boom is likely to continue beyond 2014 – albeit at a slightly slower pace. Fitch believes that new credit, based on its adjusted measure of total societal financing (TSF), may be a bit lower than the 22 trillion yen (CNY) it estimates was extended in 2013. Asset quality will therefore remain a serious concern until the economic return on credit improves.
The key aspects of the reforms are: disentangling banks from wealth management products (WMPs) to ensure appropriate risk taking, and provisioning, on balance sheets; heightening the transparency of trusts and their underlying assets; and limiting credit guarantee companies from taking on too much financial leverage.
At a minimum, says Fitch, these measures are designed to improve banks’ loan/deposit ratios and limit the interbank markets’ exposure to WMPs. More broadly, these ought to begin addressing contagion risks, as the inter-connectedness between banks and non-banks has risen. Whether regulations will be rigidly enforced and prove effective is not known.
The reforms may seem like a good beginning, but they have a long way to run. This is because the depth and breadth of shadow banking is still not clear in the absence of exhaustive official data. Moreover, the approach of the principal regulators – the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) – continues to evolve. In addition, risks continue to lurk away from the view – and at times even the jurisdiction – of these regulators.
A considerable amount of credit extension remains outside formal banking channels, hence the CBRC is understandably more keen to raise the transparency and regulation of non-bank credit activity, rather than applying a restriction on volumes. However, a more effective containment of risk may indeed require a stronger clampdown on asset expansion – especially through informal channels – but this is not yet in evidence.
More appropriate risk-taking is also contingent on complementary reforms. For instance, better alignment of local government incentives with their tax-raising and financing capabilities may lower a reliance on local government financing vehicles and shadow banking arrangements.
Fitch concludes that China’s shadow bank reforms will take time to gain traction, and recognition of asset-impairment will be a protracted process. This will manifest itself in eroding liquidity, as cash inflows from borrowers remain under pressure and more resources are directed at forbearance/support. Dwindling cash buffers amplify liquidity risk, and are likely to place structural pressure on interbank rates.
In today’s digitally connected world, infinite quantities of data are produced by consumers daily at a mind-boggling pace and volume. With under three months left to prepare, here are four areas for businesses to consider, to make sure they are ready for GDPR implementation.
Cash-flow based metrics now feature prominently alongside traditional revenue measures of business performance in the key figures or financial summary pages of any public company.
GTNews asks Pugsley about what advice she would give to treasurers dealing with mergers and acquisitions, what the key challenges for her year ahead will be and how she is selecting a treasury management system (TMS).
The US money market fund reforms came into effect in 2016 and are already dramatically shaping US fund industry with investors flooding out of prime funds and into government securities. While the reforms are similar, they are not the same. GTNews interviews Yeng Bulter, global head of the cash business at State Street Global Advisors on the differences.