US hedge fund SAC Capital will plead guilty to criminal insider trading charges and agree to pay a record US$1.8bn fine, according to a statement from federal prosecutors. In addition, the firm will close its investment advisory business and no longer manage money for outside investors.
The hedge fund, headed by billionaire Steven Cohen, has agreed to plead guilty to wire fraud and four counts of securities fraud and to close to outside investors, according to the US attorney’s office in Manhattan, which initially charged the firm in July.
SAC agreed to pay the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) about US$616m
to settle civil charges related to alleged insider trading by employees. Prosecutors say that payment is credited to the amount owed for this guilty plea, meaning that the firm will pay a further penalty of US$1.2bn.
Cohen could potentially still face criminal charges of his own, since the agreement does not include any immunity for individuals at the firm. While he has not been charged criminally, the SEC filed civil charges against him in July, accusing him of failing to supervise employees who engaged in insider trading.
Outside investors have exited the fund this year as its legal problems have mounted. Prosecutors accused SAC of fostering a culture of law breaking in which employees sought out corporate insiders for illicit investment tips. The indictment excerpts a number of e-mails and instant messages from SAC traders, suggesting they had information from corporate insiders.
A recent Gallup poll found that respondents identified the 'economy in general' as their biggest concern.
Sentiment in the financial services sector deteriorated in the three months to September, as firms digested the challenges of lower interest rates and the uncertainty caused by the vote to leave the European Union (EU), according to the latest CBI/PwC Financial Services Survey.
However, a London summit on the industry’s introduction of the technology cautions that testing and acceptance are still at an early stage and firms should proceed with caution.
The proposals of both US presidential candidates could shake up operating conditions in several sectors, reports the credit ratings agency.