Competition in the UK audit market is restricted by factors that make it hard for companies to switch accountants, according to a preliminary report of an investigation by UK watchdog the Competition Commission.
The Commission, which began its review in 2011, also found that there is a tendency for auditors to give priority to satisfying management rather than shareholder needs.
The ‘Big Four’ accounting firms of Ernst & Young (E&Y), Deloitte, KPMG and PwC, which audit around 90% of UK listed companies, were criticised for “higher prices, lower quality and less innovation” because of a lack of competition.
The Commission reported that 31% of the UK’s top 100 companies and one in five of the next 250 firms had had the same auditor for over 20 years.
The Commission found no evidence of collusion between the Big Four, but commented that they were “insufficiently independent from executive management and insufficiently sceptical in carrying out audits”.
“We have found that there can be benefits to companies and their shareholders from switching auditors but too often senior management at large companies are inclined to stick with what they know,” said Laura Carstensen, who chaired the Commission’s audit probe.
In response, the Big Four maintained that there is strong competition and cited downward pressure on fees and some recent switching of auditors by major companies.
PwC said its audits clearly report to shareholders and that the Commission has “grossly underestimated” the critical role the audit committees at clients play in protecting shareholder interests. E&Y said it was pleased the review had found no evidence of collusion, abuses or excess profits but rejected accusations that the audit market was not serving shareholders.
The report was welcomed by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), the UK’s independent regulator for corporate reporting and governance. “The FRC called for a thorough investigation by the competition authorities and welcomes [the] preliminary report. We look forward to assessing it and working with the Commission further,” said its chief executive officer, Stephen Haddrill.
“In particular we are pleased to see that the Commission is exploring measures to enhance competiveness and switching including regular audit retendering, strengthening the work of audit committees and a prohibition of Big Four-only clauses in loan provisions. The FRC introduced enhanced audit committee reporting, and retendering into the Corporate Governance Code last year, taking the view that retendering secured the benefits of mandatory rotation without its significant risks.
“We also welcome the Commission’s recognition of the value of our audit quality reviews, and look forward to discussion of whether there should be more transparency of their findings and an increase in their scope. The UK has already seen the benefits of being more open than other countries.”
Despite the data protection regulation being implemented in 2018, 69% of IT decision makers don’t have the backing of their board to achieve GDPR compliance, according to Calligo.
Chicago based Treasury Management System (TMS) vendor GTreasury and Sydney based risk and treasury management vendor Visual Risk have joined forces in a strategic alliance to ... read more
HSBC arguing that mid-market businesses are missing out on huge exporting opportunities, 3D printing being predicted to cut global trade by 23% in 2060 and the blockchain community launching a voluntary transparency project all hit the latest headlines in the world of treasury this week.
Direct carrier billing is currently a competitive payments industry in Europe, but will it flourish under PSD2? EE and Microsoft think so.