The envisaged EU banking supervision rules must be of good quality and provide for accountability. However, the member states’ current preferences for establishing them risk sending the wrong message, as well as perpetuating inefficiencies, the European Parliament (EP) has warned in a resolution.
The resolution, adopted by a show of hands, comes a day after the European Commission (EC) tabled two proposals to reinforce banking supervision. It sets out some of the key concerns that MEPs want to see addressed in decisions shaping the system.
The resolution welcomes the fact that EU countries have now accepted that an integrated bank supervision system is necessary, more than two years after the EP itself called for this. However, it sounds the alarm about governments’ apparent intention to avoid developing a system that is transparent and democratically accountable.
Member states, the resolution says, are moreover pre-empting the Commission’s role as initiator of legislation by imposing a decision-making process which would exclude the EP from deciding on one of the texts. The EP stands ready to adopt negotiating tactics to counter this, the resolution adds.
The resolution also highlights certain points of substance which should be considered in the debate on how to enact banking supervision. An important one concerns bank recapitalisations, which, the resolution suggests, could be carried out by the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). A second is the need to devise a system which will be able to address any spill-over effects on non-eurozone members stemming from the creation of a eurozone banking union.
Earlier MEPs raised these and other issues with the Commissioner responsible, Michel Barnier. Most notably they insisted that they would take care to ensure that the rules provided for sufficient accountability of the supervisor, that there would be clarity on how to deal with failing banks, and that the extra supervision for the eurozone banks would not in any way hamper the single market.
The two legislative proposals will now be scrutinised by the EP and member states over the coming months. Parliament has a consultative role for the legislative text conferring eurozone bank supervisory tasks on the ECB. The Council must await Parliament’s opinion before it can adopt this legislation. In the case of the legislative text amending the setup of the European Banking Authority (EBA), however, Parliament shares decision-making power with the Council.
The US money market fund reforms came into effect in 2016 and are already dramatically shaping US fund industry with investors flooding out of prime funds and into government securities. While the reforms are similar, they are not the same. GTNews interviews Yeng Bulter, global head of the cash business at State Street Global Advisors on the differences.
There are various ways for financial institutions to benefit from advanced technologies and business models provided by FinTech's. Whether a business' approach is radical or incremental, data management can help a company to increase their return on investment, argues André Casterman, INTIX.
Due to the low interest rate environment and Basel III regulation many corporate treasurers, who may have in the past been very reliant on the banking sector to provide them with cash management solutions, have been forced to explore alternative options as banks have been refusing short dated cash deposits.
Apps are a critical part of treasury's shift into mobile banking as 67% of treasury and corporate finance professionals said mobile banking services are of particular interest to them in a recent survey.