The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has issued a paper for consultation entitled ‘
Supervisory Guidance for Managing Risks Associated with the Settlement of Foreign Exchange (FX) Transactions
These proposals update the Committee’s ‘
Supervisory Guidance for Managing Settlement Risk in FX Transactions
’. Since publication of that guidance in 2000, the FX market has made significant strides in reducing the risks associated with settlement of FX transactions. However, substantial FX settlement-related risks remain, not least because of the rapid growth in FX trading.
The proposed new guidance aims to ensure that such risks are effectively managed. It provides more comprehensive and detailed direction on governance arrangements and the management of principal risk, replacement cost risk and all other FX settlement-related risks. In addition, the guidance promotes the use of payment-versus-payment (PvP) arrangements, where practicable, to reduce principal risk.
The guidance is organised into seven guidelines that address governance, principal risk, replacement cost risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, legal risk and capital for FX transactions.
Comments should be submitted by Friday 12 October 2012.
The US money market fund reforms came into effect in 2016 and are already dramatically shaping US fund industry with investors flooding out of prime funds and into government securities. While the reforms are similar, they are not the same. GTNews interviews Yeng Bulter, global head of the cash business at State Street Global Advisors on the differences.
As the May 25 deadline for Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) inches closer, many treasurers are being lumped with the task of ensuring their wider company is compliant.
APIs may be a solution to MT940 challenges, says Karen Fagan, treasury operation manager, for British television company, ITV.
Kicking off day two of the Singapore Fintech Festival, Deloitte Chairman David Cruikshank said that fintech is significant for three reasons. First, customer expectations of services are higher than ever. Second, barriers to entry are lower than before. And finally, financial institutions (FIs) face a threat of what a competitor might do.