JWG Warns Politician of Critical Infrastructure Holes in EU Plans

The UK’s House of Commons Treasury Committee has published its response to the European Commission’s financial services ‘Omnibus’ Directive, which is being pushed by the Swedish Presidency for agreement by 2 December 2009. Following three weeks of consideration, the committee has focused its attention on points of law and the agreement process. This means that the political urgency to create more powerful tools to supervise banks internationally has yet again failed to consider the practical implications of regulatory implementation and could put the G20’s objectives at risk, according to thinktank JWG.

PJ Di Giammarino, chief executive officer (CEO) of JWG, said: “Another chance to have a meaningful debate about the impractical requirements of a 93-point action plan has been missed. There are some real, substantive issues with the current regulatory approach that have not been addressed by this committee. We are concerned that, unless the basic infrastructure issues are discussed in Brussels this year, the regulators and the banks will find themselves in a position where, rather than fighting financial fires, they will be fuelling an inferno of bad data in 2010.”

JWG’s letter to the committee highlights the dangers of this current regulatory ‘race to the top’ which is failing to address the enormous data quality challenges inherent in controlling such a fast moving marketplace.

Di Giammarino added: “There must be a clear consensus in Europe of what information is necessary and sufficient for successful oversight, plus agreement of what ‘good quality data looks like’ and how it should best be transmitted. Without this common understanding, we are in jeopardy of creating an even bigger conflagration. We are in danger of assessing risks based on bad data, which could well magnify and distort the issues we aspire to extinguish, at great cost to the economy.

“Individually, each Member State needs to be able to make sense of the information it has asked for and then share understanding across jurisdictions which have different languages, laws, tax codes, cultures and business systems. With the current approach, it is difficult see how such highly complex and technically challenging set of problems will be overcome to create an integrated picture of risk in the timeframes prescribed.”


Related reading